Saturday, December 10, 2011

Comedy Spotlight - Military Weapons in Gangsters' Hands

Let's be frank. I love military.com, but this article gives me cause to pause. It is glaringly stereotypical, lacks credibility; and is laced with: anecdotal sublimation,associative inferences,blind assumption, prejudice,profiling and paranoia. Even the accompanying photo is in fact, inaccurate. In all my life, I have not seen such a level of ignorance at our high levels of intelligence. There is NO gang in America that flashes that gesture as a gang sign. The expression on the soldier's face is silly, and not consistent with expressions any gang member would make while displaying an actual gang sign. The entire article is speculative and inconclusive, and actually undercuts our military's tactical efforts. This article is purely fiction and blatant fear-mongering. The story should've never gotten clearance. IT'S EMBARRASSING!!!!

Check this link for the story---> Military Weapons in Gangsters' Hands

Friday, December 9, 2011

Founder's Note: B.R.I.M. is now B.F.S.P.

About 1 month ago, the operative and effective name of this "progressive network" was changed from Beings' Rights International Movement (BRIM), to the new operative and effective name, Beings For Societal Progression (BFSP).  The reasoning for the change is that the new operative and effective name gives of a more magnetic and kinetically receptive energy flow, and has more of a liquidity of movement when communicated.  The new name en-capsulizes the intent and trajectory of this network, and reaches a broader interdemographia of persons.  Thank you for the acceptance of this change.

Sincerely,

Michraél E. James
   

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Cognition 2. The U.S. spy drone was first taken over electronically. It is 2011; intelligence is in everyone, and technology is everywhere. The time of the paranoia propaganda era is over. Why continue to sell it? Nuclear science is old technology; older than even the "Cold War". What's really inciting the U.S. Government?

Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.1

An example of the third adrenal response to fear or anxiety....."cognition". Any questions? Psychologists can either listen, or learn.

Published with Blogger-droid v2.0.1

Example of "Title Stigmatization" (video)

Confusion Led To Thousands Of Tossed Votes Across State, Study Finds - NY1.com

After taking another look at this video, I discovered another disturbing fact about the statements made; the implication that so-called "low-income" voters are not intelligent enough to use more sophisticated equipment (sort of bicameral man v/s enlightened thinker), that socio-economic standing somehow denotes intelligence, and that sovereign individuals are being classified and stigmatized according to zip code.  Note: In New York, as is probably anywhere in America, goods and services are made accessible according to zip code.  Oh, what tangled web of prejudice our country has woven!  This is why I have designed to put an end to class, and I will succeed.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Example of "Title Stigmatization"

NY1 ran a story on their news broadcast on Dec. 6, 2011, where the news director approved the teleprompter to actually read "higher population of Low-Income Voters", in a story that highlighted the inefficiency of some voting machines in accounting for over voting.  Anika Pergament, acting as "Lead Anchor" on the same morning, was heard at 8:04a.m. making the statement near the end of the story.

The statement is just one of many examples of "Title Stigmatization" through all forms of media and language from ads and speeches, to curriculum and policy hearings.  The statement could be concurred to mean "black" voters, but it is actually a much broader socio-political stigmatization, since it could be interpreted as an inference directed at anyone not currently members of the two upper tax brackets.

Currently the term "low-income" can literally be implied as the "99%", as touted by OWS activists.  The news story validates this by making a supposition in projecting that there will be a higher turnout of the national majority, which is the 99% of those not classified as wealthy or rich, to vote in 2012, in efforts to re-elect President Obama.                    

by: Michraél James/Founder-B.F.S.P.

xx (video to follow later today)